Who pays the carbon tax?
Big news these days is the tax on carbon. The belief behind this move is that if you have to pay more for polluting the atmosphere you will choose to pollute less.
I was still a smoker when the government instituted big taxes on cigarettes. It angered me but did not stop me from smoking...something to which I was addicted. However it did create new industry... shipping untaxed cigarettes across the border and then smuggling them back bringing a new source of profit for the "entrepreneurs"
My point, "sin taxes" are generally an ineffective way to change peoples habits.
The other and more critical issue in the proposed "carbon tax" is that it will most affect those who can least afford it. Those who are poor or who are on fixed/limited incomes. Ah Ha! If you can't afford oil to heat your home, then get up and run around the room and stay warm that way. Or as my mother used to say, put on a sweater. "Another one", I always answered in a sarcastic tone...which started the usual verbal battle.
Now, if you can afford to buy a super sized, over powered, gas guzzler to drive around and impress the neighbors, you can probably afford to pay a bit more for gas. But if like most workers, you need your wheels to get to your minimum wage job at the mall and the bus doesn't run by the house, then the extra price for your gas is going to hurt. Oh Yes, buy a hybrid and then you won't have to use as much gas. You only have to double the price you pay for the vehicle so that it takes twenty years to offset the savings on the gas you didn't use???
My solution to the problem is to take all vehicles out of our cities except for mass transit. No cars big or small. Bring back the rail lines, Take the big rigs off the roads and out of the cities. Tim Hortons and Robins and the ilk will hate this suggestion. But just consider for a moment the amount of pollution generated by the drive through lines at so called "fast food" restaurants and coffee houses.
Possible, probably not. Too many dollars being made in the auto industry, the oil industry and the coffee industry. We have been too accoustomed to the easy way rather than being organized. As a child our family did not have a car. My father rode to work on the bus. We took a wagon to the supermarket to carry groceries home. We walked to the theater and school and the nearby empty lots to play.
The one thing that is possible is to ban private autos inside city limits and institute a vigorous economical mass transit system. That could significantly reduce smog problems for our big cities and ultimately reduce our carbon emissions. It could be done. It has been done...I can't remember where, someplace in Europe I think where license plates that ended in odd or even numbers could only be in the city on alternate days.
But don't tax y necessary home heating system. Don't tax my necessary auto travel. Don't tax the poor and allow the wealthy to pollute without regard.
I was still a smoker when the government instituted big taxes on cigarettes. It angered me but did not stop me from smoking...something to which I was addicted. However it did create new industry... shipping untaxed cigarettes across the border and then smuggling them back bringing a new source of profit for the "entrepreneurs"
My point, "sin taxes" are generally an ineffective way to change peoples habits.
The other and more critical issue in the proposed "carbon tax" is that it will most affect those who can least afford it. Those who are poor or who are on fixed/limited incomes. Ah Ha! If you can't afford oil to heat your home, then get up and run around the room and stay warm that way. Or as my mother used to say, put on a sweater. "Another one", I always answered in a sarcastic tone...which started the usual verbal battle.
Now, if you can afford to buy a super sized, over powered, gas guzzler to drive around and impress the neighbors, you can probably afford to pay a bit more for gas. But if like most workers, you need your wheels to get to your minimum wage job at the mall and the bus doesn't run by the house, then the extra price for your gas is going to hurt. Oh Yes, buy a hybrid and then you won't have to use as much gas. You only have to double the price you pay for the vehicle so that it takes twenty years to offset the savings on the gas you didn't use???
My solution to the problem is to take all vehicles out of our cities except for mass transit. No cars big or small. Bring back the rail lines, Take the big rigs off the roads and out of the cities. Tim Hortons and Robins and the ilk will hate this suggestion. But just consider for a moment the amount of pollution generated by the drive through lines at so called "fast food" restaurants and coffee houses.
Possible, probably not. Too many dollars being made in the auto industry, the oil industry and the coffee industry. We have been too accoustomed to the easy way rather than being organized. As a child our family did not have a car. My father rode to work on the bus. We took a wagon to the supermarket to carry groceries home. We walked to the theater and school and the nearby empty lots to play.
The one thing that is possible is to ban private autos inside city limits and institute a vigorous economical mass transit system. That could significantly reduce smog problems for our big cities and ultimately reduce our carbon emissions. It could be done. It has been done...I can't remember where, someplace in Europe I think where license plates that ended in odd or even numbers could only be in the city on alternate days.
But don't tax y necessary home heating system. Don't tax my necessary auto travel. Don't tax the poor and allow the wealthy to pollute without regard.